The 2012 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter marked a significant shift in the American cargo van market, introducing a European design philosophy that prioritized functionality and efficiency. Originally offered as a Dodge, the Sprinter quickly gained recognition for its distinct boxy shape and numerous advantages over traditional American vans. As Ford and Ram followed suit with their European-inspired models, the Sprinter solidified its position as a benchmark in the commercial van segment. This review delves into the specifics of the 2012 Benz Sprinter, exploring its design, features, performance, and overall value proposition.
One of the most immediately noticeable aspects of the 2012 Sprinter is its driver-centric cabin. The high seating position, coupled with a large windshield and a minimal instrument panel, provides excellent visibility and a commanding view of the road. Unlike traditional American vans with intrusive engine housings, the Sprinter’s engine intrudes less into the passenger compartment, maximizing legroom and overall space. The seats, characterized by their firm, German-engineered feel, prioritize support and comfort, particularly beneficial for long working hours behind the wheel. While manual adjustments are standard, an optional package offers front and rear height, recline, and lumbar support, ensuring a customizable driving experience without the complexity of power controls.
Spaciousness and Cargo Capacity
The 2012 Benz Sprinter excelled in offering a range of body styles to meet diverse needs. Available in 144-inch wheelbase regular roof, 144-inch wheelbase high roof, 170-inch wheelbase high roof, and 170-inch wheelbase extended length high roof configurations (cargo van only), the Sprinter provided unparalleled cargo space. Even the standard roof model surpassed traditional GM vans in ceiling height, offering 60.6 inches compared to 52.9 inches. The high roof option further enhanced interior space, allowing individuals up to six feet tall to stand upright comfortably – a crucial feature for professionals working inside the van. The rear cargo opening was also significantly wider at 61.6 inches versus 57.0 inches in GM vans, and this width was consistently maintained from floor to ceiling thanks to the Sprinter’s nearly vertical body sides. Cargo lengths varied from 128.5 inches to an expansive 185.0 inches depending on the chosen body length, outperforming GM vans which offered 124.6 inches or 146.2 inches. In terms of cubic feet, the Sprinter boasted 318, 494, or 547 cubic feet, significantly exceeding the GM van’s 270 or 314 cubic feet. This superior cargo volume meant even the shortest Sprinter model could hold more cargo than a long GM van and double the capacity of a typical minivan.
Accessibility to this substantial cargo area was facilitated by wide, floor-to-ceiling door openings, including a standard right-side sliding door and an optional left-side sliding door. The rear doors offered a remarkable 270-degree opening capability, further simplifying loading and unloading. The Sprinter 3500 model showcased impressive payload and towing capacities, handling up to 5,375 pounds of payload and towing up to 7,500 pounds. While the tested 2500 model had a payload of 2,872 pounds, it remained competitive within its class.
Passenger configurations for the 2012 Benz Sprinter ranged from two to twelve occupants, adaptable with one, two, three, or four rows of seats. Even with four rows installed in the 170-inch wheelbase version, over six feet of cargo space remained. Factory options for passenger comfort included roof-mounted rear HVAC vents, reflecting a focus on practicality rather than luxury.
Engine and Performance
Under the hood, the 2012 Sprinter featured a 3.0-liter turbocharged diesel V6 engine, producing 188 horsepower at 3,800 rpm and 325 pound-feet of torque at 1,400 rpm. This engine, while smaller than the V8 options in American vans, provided adequate power for the Sprinter’s intended purpose. Paired with Mercedes-Benz’s reliable five-speed automatic transmission, the powertrain delivered sufficient acceleration, even at highway speeds. While a 0-60 mph time of around 13 seconds might seem modest for a car, it was more than acceptable for a vehicle of the Sprinter’s size and cargo capacity. Real-world feedback indicated that the engine performed capably even when carrying heavy loads. Fuel economy was a significant advantage, with claims of low 20s mpg in city driving and mid-20s on the highway. Even during testing involving aggressive acceleration, the trip computer reported 17.6 mpg, surpassing the fuel efficiency of many smaller passenger vehicles. The diesel engine required Adblue, but the cost and availability of Adblue were no longer significant concerns. Engine noise was minimal, especially at higher speeds, and the transmission, while not the quickest to react, performed reliably.
Handling and Ride Quality
Despite its size, the 2012 Benz Sprinter offered surprisingly manageable handling. The expansive windshield provided an unobstructed forward view, minimizing the perceived size of the van. Large, dual-element mirrors compensated for the limited rear visibility in cargo van configurations. Optional front and rear obstacle detection further aided maneuvering in tight spaces. The steering, though light and slow, felt natural after a short adjustment period. Body control was tighter than in typical vans, contributing to a more stable driving experience. The ride, even without a load, was slightly jiggly in the 2500 model but remained composed overall. Standard stability control enhanced safety, although the van’s handling characteristics were generally predictable and stable under normal driving conditions.
Pricing and Value
The 2012 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter started at $37,285 for the 144-inch wheelbase model and $42,395 for the 170-inch wheelbase version. Options like the high roof and extended wheelbase added to the price, but even with basic amenities included, the Sprinter represented a significant investment for a cargo van. Compared to a Chevrolet Express 2500 extended length van, the Sprinter was more expensive. However, when considering the diesel engine option for the GM van, the price difference narrowed considerably. The Sprinter’s advantages in cargo volume, fuel efficiency, and European design made it a compelling choice for businesses and individuals prioritizing these factors. The prestige associated with the Mercedes-Benz brand also added to its appeal, particularly for businesses serving upscale clientele.
Conclusion
The 2012 Benz Sprinter stood out as a class-leading cargo van, particularly before the arrival of new Euro-sourced vans from Ford and Ram. Its high roof, generous cargo volume, refined suspension, and fuel-efficient diesel engine set it apart from traditional American vans. For professionals seeking a capable, spacious, and efficient cargo van with a touch of prestige, the 2012 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter remained an excellent choice.
